Brown v. State

Joshua Tyler Brown appeals from the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.151 motion to set aside his conviction for first-degree endangering the welfare of a child. His sole point asserts that the motion court clearly erred in denying his post-conviction motion, contending that trial counsel was ineffective due to a conflict of interest in that he represented both Brown and Brown's co-defendant at the time of Brown's trial. We affirm.

*423Facts and Procedural Background

Brown was charged by amended information with the class C felony of first-degree endangering the welfare of a…