Legal Opinion
MacDONALD v. CORPORATE INTEGRIS HEALTH
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 25, 2014No. 111717PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REIF, V.C.J.
{11 This Court is asked to decide whether the damage provisions in section 1850 of the Oklahoma Anti-Discrimination Act (OADA), 25 0.98.2011, §§ 1101 through 1706, violate the special law prohibitions in Article 5, §§ 46 and 59 of the Oklahoma Constitution. This issue arose in a case filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma. The plaintiff alleged her former employer terminated her employment in violation of both federal law and the OADA. Unlike the "all detriment" common law damage remedy for wrongful termination, section 1350 of the OADA…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Burk v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Vigil v. ArzolaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
- Zeier v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Hayes v. Eateries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- SOUTHON v. OKLAHOMA TIRE RECYCLERS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- SOUTHON v. OKLAHOMA TIRE RECYCLERS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- BAUGHMAN v. WORLD ACCEPTANCE CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2025
- Burr v. MittalDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2023
- Culp v. ReynoldsDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.