Legal Opinion

Culp v. Reynolds

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided April 3, 2020No. 5:19-cv-00424Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ANNA KATIE CULP, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-19-424-PRW ) JIM REYNOLDS, individually and in his ) official capacity as Cleveland County ) Treasurer, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Jim Reynolds’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s claims (Dkt. 6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff opposes this request (Dkt. 12) and asks that she be granted leave to amend any claim the Court dismisses. For the reasons outlined below, the motion is granted. Background Plaintiff…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Khalik v. United Air LinesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API