Legal Opinion

Wooley v. Watkins

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1889PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from District Court, Bingham County. This is an appeal by H. S. Wooley from a judgment rendered against him on the sixteenth day of October, 1888, in Bingham county, by the district court of the third judicial district of the territory of Idaho, dismissing his complaint and application for a writ of mandamus against C. N. Watkins, registrar of voters in Paris precinct, Bear Lake county, to compel him to register his name in the list of voters of that precinct.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from District Court, Bingham County. This is an appeal by H. S. Wooley from a judgment rendered against him on the sixteenth day of October, 1888, in Bingham county, by the district court of the third judicial district of the territory of Idaho, dismissing his complaint and application for a writ of mandamus against C. N. Watkins, registrar of voters in Paris precinct, Bear Lake county, to compel him to register his name in the list of voters of that precinct. On the fifth day of October, 1888, the relator filed his petition, wherein he avers “that he is a male inhabitant and…

1Opinion of the CourtWeir, C. J.

(After Stating the Facts.) — The argument of this ease at bar took a wide range, but the real questions involved lie in a narrow compass. They may be briefly stated in the following order: 1. Was the relator, at the time he demanded and was refused registration, a member of any order, organization, or association, and, if so, does that order, organization, or association teach, advise, counsel or encourage its members, devotees or other persons to commit the crime of bigamy or polygamy, or any other crime forbidden by law, as a duty arising from membership in such order, organization, or…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  4. Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  5. Chew Heong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gillesby v. Board of County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Amick v. Empire Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  3. Noble v. Ada County Elections BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Board of Regents of Okla. Agricultural Colleges v. UpdegraffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  5. Demartini v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API