Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America, Division 998 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Vinson
In these cases, the constitutionality of labor legislation of the State of Wisconsin known as the Public Utility Anti-Strike Law,1 has been drawn in question.
Petitioners in No. 329 are the union and its officers who represent the employees of the Milwaukee Electric Railway and Transport Company of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, for collective-bargaining purposes.2 For many years, the transit workers entered into collective-bargaining agreements with the transit company without resorting to strike. In 1948, however, the collective agreement was terminated when the parties were unable to agree on wages,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. MacKay Radio & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bethlehem Steel Co. v. New York State Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- National Labor Relations Board v. FainblattSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- National Labor Relations Board v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by190 opinions
- Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Labor Relations Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Geneva Butts v. The City of New York Department of Housing Preservation and DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United Construction Workers v. Laburnum Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.