Legal Opinion

United States v. Yazell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 18, 1966No. 10PublishedCited by 396 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fortas

This case presents an aspect of the continuing problem of the interaction of federal and state laws in our complex federal system. Specifically, the question presented is whether, in the circumstances of this case, the Federal Government, in its zealous pursuit of the balance due on a disaster loan made by the Small Business Administration, may obtain judgment against Ethel Mae *343Yazell of Lampasas, Texas. At the time the loan was made, Texas law provided that a married woman could not bind her separate property unless she had first obtained a court decree removing her disability to contract.1…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. United States v. BessSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by396 opinions

  1. Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

391 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API