Legal Opinion

Simon v. Cebrick

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 26, 1995No. 94-5429UnknownCited by 136 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SAROKIN, Circuit Judge.

The question presented is whether mortgages held by the FDIC can be extinguished without the FDIC’s consent through foreclosure of plaintiffs superior real estate tax liens. We hold that the district court correctly interpreted and applied 12 U.S.C. § 1825(b)(2) to protect the FDIC’s lien interests from foreclosure. Additionally, we hold that the Tax Injunction Act does not divest the district court of jurisdiction over this action and that the delay in the enforcement of plaintiffs tax liens does not presently rise to the level of a compensable…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Moe v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Moore v. TartlerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. Department of Employment v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by136 opinions

  1. Simon v. CebrickCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Burgos-FigueroaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  3. (SS) French v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. (SS) Gilding v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  5. (SS) Hernandez v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API