Legal Opinion

John L. Lewis v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 24, 1982No. 80-5905PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POOLE, Circuit Judge:

On July 27, 1979, appellant John Lewis was injured by a vehicle owned and operated by the Los Angeles branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. Lewis brought this action in district court alleging jurisdiction under the Federal Tort Claims Act (the Act), 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b). The United States moved to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The district court dismissed, holding that the Federal Reserve Bank is not a federal agency within the meaning of the Act and that the court therefore lacked subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm.

In enacting the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Logue v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bismarck Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Federal Land Bank v. PriddySupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Bollow v. Federal Reserve Bank of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Kuntz v. Lamar Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Marques v. Federal Reserve Bank of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  3. Fasano v. Federal Reserve BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  4. Victoria Bank & Trust Co. v. Brady, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
  5. Mendrala v. Crown Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API