Department of Transportation v. Harkey
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the elimination of defendant property owners’ direct access to an abutting highway is a taking under G.S. 136-89.53, entitling them to compensation for damages in a condemnation proceeding, when access to the highway remains available via a series of residential streets. We conclude there has been a taking under well-established principles in this state, and the property owners are entitled to compensation for the loss of direct access.
Plaintiff filed its complaint pursuant to article nine of chapter 136 of the General…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Long v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- People v. AyonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- North Carolina State Highway Commission v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Hedrick v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Responsible Citizens in Opposition to the Flood Plain Ordinance v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Beroth Oil Co. v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
- Beroth Oil Co. v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- City of Charlotte v. CombsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.