Graves v. Man Group USA, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES B. ZAGEL, District Judge.
In this case, Plaintiff Nathan Graves (“Plaintiff’ or “Graves”) has brought suit against his former employer alleging defamation per se, defamation per quod, 1 interference with a business relationship, and intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”). Defendants Man Group USA, Inc. and its subsidiary Man Financial, Inc. (collectively “Man” or “Defendants”) filed a motion to dismiss, which is currently before me. For the reasons that follow, Man’s motion is denied.
I. BACKGROUND
Graves began his employment with Man in around…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McGrath v. FaheyIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Public Finance Corp. v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Fellhauer v. City of GenevaIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Flentye v. KathreinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Bergman v. St. Clair CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2025