Legal Opinion
Hamill v. Bay Bridge Associates
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided July 22, 1998PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Bay Bridge Associates appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Mills, J.) denying its motion pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 60 for relief from the judgment entered in favor of William D. Hamill. On appeal, Bay Bridge contends that it did not stipulate to a judgment in Hamill’s favor and that the stipulation for and confession of judgment offered by Hamill and adopted by the court should have, been rejected. We agree and vacate the judgment.
I
[¶ 2] Between 1991 and 1995, the various defendants in this action 1 executed nine different…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Levinsky's, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Reville v. RevilleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- Michaud v. Mutual Fire, Marine & Inland Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- Senty v. Board of Osteopathic Examination & RegistrationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- Land Use Regulation Commission v. TuckSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
3Cited by6 opinions
- Boyer v. BoyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- In Re Estate of ShapiroSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Jeffrey WhiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
- Raynes v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Hamill v. LibertySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.