Legal Opinion
Hamill v. Liberty
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided February 16, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, J.
[¶ 1] Michael A. Liberty, Liberty Group, Inc., East Machias Limited Partnership, and Mainland Development Company appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Mills, J.) denying their motion for relief, pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 60(b)(5) and (6), from a judgment entered in favor of William D. Hamill. We affirm the judgment.
[¶ 2] Pursuant to a stipulation between the parties, the Superior Court (Calkins, J.) entered judgment against the defendants on their admitted debt to the plaintiff on June 17, 1997. The defendants did not appeal from the entry of the judgment. 1 Their…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- West Point-Pepperell, Inc. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Ruidoso State Bank v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- Glamorgan Coal Corp. v. BowenDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1990
- Hamill v. Bay Bridge AssociatesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Fuller v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. City of BangorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Tarbuck v. JaeckelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Marquis v. MarquisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Vital Basics, Inc. v. Vertrue Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2007