Legal Opinion

Boyer v. Boyer

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 5, 1999PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.

[¶ 1] Defendants, James Boyer, Wendy Boyer, and Julia O’Leary appeal from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Hjelm, J.), affirming an order of the District Court (Waterville, Mullen, J.), denying a M.R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) motion to set aside a judgment which ordered a partition of real property in Belgrade to be carried out by a sale. They contend that the order of partition by sale entered by the District Court, at the request of Constance Boyer, should be set aside for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Because we agree that the District Court lacks statutory and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Warren v. Waterville Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  2. Estate of WhittierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  3. Libby v. LorrainSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  4. Maker v. LazellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1891
  5. Northeast Bank N.A. v. CrochereSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Roe v. DoeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In re Henry B.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  3. Haynes v. JacksonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  4. Cummings v. BeanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  5. Francis v. Dana-CummingsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API