Legal Opinion

Land Use Regulation Commission v. Tuck

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 5, 1985PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLASSMAN, Justice.

The defendant, Thomas T. Tuck, appeals a Superior Court, Somerset County, judgment denying his motion, pursuant to M.R. Civ.P. 60(b), 1 for relief from a judgment of contempt. The plaintiff, the Land Use Regulation Commission (LURC), cross-appeals the denial of its motion for further contempt sanctions. We vacate that portion of the judgment requiring the defendant to pay a $10,000 fine “to this court on or before October 15, 1982.” We deny LURC’s cross-appeal.

I

Under the authority of 12 M.R.S.A. § 685-C(8), 2 LURC filed suit in 1975 against the defendant, owner and developer…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Nye v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. In re NevittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  4. McCrone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. United States v. Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization (Patco), Patco Local 202, Robert Belanger, PresidentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wrenn v. LewisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  2. Foley v. AdamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  3. Boyer v. BoyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  4. Christine A. Murphy v. William E. BartlettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  5. In Re Estate of ShapiroSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API