Legal Opinion

Carrillo v. Hoyl

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided November 28, 1973No. 1216PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LOPEZ, Judge.

A pickup truck collided with Hoyl’s mare which had escaped from Schnaubert’s corral. Plaintiffs are respectively the passenger, driver and owner of the pickup. Plaintiffs sued defendants for negligence. Defendants’ motions for summary judgment were granted. Plaintiffs appeal only from the summary judgment in favor of Schnaubert, claiming the Schnaubert summary judgment was improper because of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.

We first consider whether Schnaubert made a prima facie showing entitling him to summary judgment. Tapia v. McKenzie, 83 N.M. 116, 489 P.2d 181…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Renfro v. JD Coggins CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Martin v. Board of Education of City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Mitchell v. RidgwayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Tapia v. McKenzieNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Akin v. BerkshireNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. St. Joseph's HospitalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Archuleta v. GoldmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Archuleta v. GoldmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Martinez v. TeagueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Martinez v. TeagueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API