Legal Opinion
Seelin Medical, Inc. v. Invacare Corp.
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)
Decided September 28, 2006No. 11-05-00116-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICK STRANGE, Justice.
This is an indemnity dispute between codefendants in a products liability action. Seelin Medical, Inc. filed a cross-claim against Invacare Corporation contending that Seelin had been sued in a products liability action, that it was an innocent seller, and that it was entitled to indemnity from Invacare, the product’s manufacturer, pursuant to Chapter 82 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code. 1 The trial court granted Invacare’s motion for summary judgment finding that it had no duty to indemnify Seelin. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.
Background…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- King Ranch, Inc. v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Science Spectrum, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Randall's Food Markets, Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Centeq Realty, Inc. v. SieglerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hadley v. WYETH LABORATORIES, INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
- FLS Miljo, Inc. v. Munters Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2010
- Dr. Arthur Hadley v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
- Jacquelyn Elmore, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Ron Elmore, and Intervenor, Ronnie Elmore v. E. Sullivan Advertising & Design, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2008
- Johnnie Dennis v. Giles Group, Inc. D/B/A Furniture Factory Warehouse, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.