Riverside Cement Co. v. Masson
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: Henry E. McGinn, Judge. This is an action by the Riverside Portland Cement Company against Frank Masson. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiff and the defendant being dissatisfied, prosecutes this appeal. The facts brought out are set forth in the opinion of the court. Department 1.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ramsey
This is an action to recover a balance of $330.60 and interest alleged to be due the defendant for goods and *503merchandise, sold by the plaintiff to the defendant, in the month of October, 1911. The complaint is substantially a quantum valebant count in assumpsit, and it alleges that the plaintiff, in the month of October, 1911, at the special instance and request of the defendant, sold and delivered to the defendant goods, wares and merchandise, of the reasonable value of $1,621.10, and admits that $1,290.50 thereof has been paid, leaving still unpaid a balance of $330.60. By a bill of items,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Bailey v. TaaffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Thompson v. ConnellOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Murray v. BuellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- State v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mattfeld v. NesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Priddy v. TaborCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Prescott-Phœnix Oil & Gas Co. v. Gilliland Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Gaither v. MeachamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Shaw v. ChristoffersenOregon Supreme Court · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.