Legal Opinion

Gaither v. Meacham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 25, 1926No. 7 Div. 590PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

This is a civil suit in damages for having carnal knowledge of a girl over 12 and under 16 years of age. The controlling question is whether 'consent of a girl 15 years of age to enter into sexual intercourse with a man is, under our law, a defense to such action.

“Any person who has carnal knowledge of any girl over twelve and under sixteen years of age, or abuses such girl in the attempt to have carnal knowledge of her, must, on conviction, be punished at the discretion of the jury, by imprisonment in the penitentiary for not less than two nor more than ten years. This-section, however,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Watson v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Dean v. . RapleeNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Hough v. IderhoffOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Bishop v. ListonNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Priboth v. HaveronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wiggins v. Stewart Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Glover v. CallahanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Parsons v. ParkerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  4. Gaines v. WolcottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  5. Barton v. Bee Line, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API