Legal Opinion

Montero v. Foreman

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 27, 2003No. 1 CA-SA 02-0337PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SNOW, Judge.

¶ 1 Petitioner Josué Montero seeks special action relief from the Maricopa County Superior Court’s determination that he is not probation eligible under Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13-901.01. For the following reasons, we accept jurisdiction of the special action but deny relief..

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 On July 3, 2001, Montero pled guilty to disorderly conduct, a class 6 designated felony, with the agreement that the State dismiss the “dangerous” designation that it had alleged with the crime. 1 On the same date, Montero also pled guilty to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Escalanti v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  2. State v. BenakCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  3. Bechtel v. Rose in and for Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Hamilton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  5. State v. RodriguezArizona Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. JoynerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. United States v. Antonio-AgustaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  3. State of Arizona v. Debbie Lynn CopelandCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  4. State of Arizona v. Ramon Anthony JoynerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. State v. MedranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API