Montero v. Foreman
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SNOW, Judge.
¶ 1 Petitioner Josué Montero seeks special action relief from the Maricopa County Superior Court’s determination that he is not probation eligible under Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13-901.01. For the following reasons, we accept jurisdiction of the special action but deny relief..
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 On July 3, 2001, Montero pled guilty to disorderly conduct, a class 6 designated felony, with the agreement that the State dismiss the “dangerous” designation that it had alleged with the crime. 1 On the same date, Montero also pled guilty to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Escalanti v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- State v. BenakCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Bechtel v. Rose in and for Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Hamilton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- State v. RodriguezArizona Supreme Court · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. JoynerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- United States v. Antonio-AgustaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- State of Arizona v. Debbie Lynn CopelandCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- State of Arizona v. Ramon Anthony JoynerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State v. MedranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015