McGonigle v. Gryphan
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed February 4, 1930:
Stevens, J.
The appeal presents the single question whether the plaintiff can maintain this action after accepting an award under the workmen’s compensation act.
At an early date doubt was expressed whether an action would lie in favor of one employee against a co-employee for injuries caused by the latter’s 'negligence. 18 Ruling Case Law, p. 540. But Wisconsin, in- common with most other states, has adopted the rule that, if one co-employee negligently injures his fellow employees, “it is no defense, in a suit against him, to assert that they…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zimmer v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Behr v. SothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Churchill v. StephensSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
- Webster v. StewartMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Cermak v. Milwaukee Air Power Pump Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Feitig v. ChalkleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
- Ransom v. HanerAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
- United States v. AcordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Zimmerman v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Nepstad v. LambertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.