Legal Opinion

McRae v. McRae

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 1924No. Civ. Nos. 4388-4389PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

Two suits in equity were filed by the respondent against appellant on the nineteenth day of July, 1921, one involving certain furniture and other personal property, and the other an interest in a contract for the purchase from defendant Los Angeles Investment Company of lot 208 of St. Vincent College tract, in the city of Los Angeles, which respondent assigned and transferred to appellant on February 25, 1918, each praying that a decree be entered declaring that appellant held said property in trust for the use and benefit of respondent, and that he be required to re-convey the same, with the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Sheehan v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Fanning v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Cooney v. GlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Lauricella v. LauricellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dunn v. MullanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Steinberger v. SteinbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Estate of LissnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Benson v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Adams v. TalbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API