Legal Opinion
Precision Asset Management Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 26, 2016No. 15-1495 CPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Post-Award Bid Protest; Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Standing; Economic Interest; Substantial Chance.
OPINION
James F. Merow, Senior Judge
Precision Asset Management Corporation (“plaintiff’ or “Precision”) filed the instant *230post-award bid protest on December 10, 2015. See Doc. 1. In the complaint, plaintiff alleges that the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) failed to fairly evaluate its proposal to manage certain property for the government, and asks that the court direct HUD to reconsider its submission. See id, at 2-3.
1. BACKGROUND AND RELEVANT FACTS
The Federal Housing…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Information Technology & Applications Corporation v. United States, and Rs Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Weeks Marine, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Trusted Integration, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Q Integrated Companies, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Prescient, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Ultimate Concrete, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Reo Solution, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- 22nd Century Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.