Legal Opinion
Prescient, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 29, 2016No. 16-109CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Keywords: Post-Award Bid Protest; Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record; Standing; Disparate Treatment; Material Deficiencies.
OPINION AND ORDER
KAPLAN, Judge.
The plaintiff in this case is Prescient, Inc. (Prescient), an unsuccessful offeror in a procurement for asset management services. Prescient filed this post-award bid protest to challenge a decision of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) finding its proposal technically unacceptable under the terms of the solicitation and excluding it from further consideration for an award.
Currently before the Court are the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Advanced Data Concepts, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Q Integrated Companies, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Agile-Bot II, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Asset Protection & Security Services, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Govwave, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
- Mortgage Contracting Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.