Legal Opinion
Ultimate Concrete, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 30, 2016No. 16-152CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Post-Award Bid Protest; Independent Government Estimate; Unbalanced Bid; Responsiveness; Modification of Bid; Anti-Deficiency Act; Advanced Payment
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Senior Judge
This is a post-award bid protest. Plaintiff, Ultimate Concrete, LLC (“Ultimate”) alleges that the decision of the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth District (“Agency” or “Corps”) to enter into a contract with Fortis Networks, Inc. (“Fortis”) was arbitrary and capricious and in violation of procurement law. Before the court are cross motions for judgment on the administrative record. Oral argument was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Information Technology & Applications Corporation v. United States, and Rs Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Rex Service Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Brandt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Munilla Construction Management, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Xpo Logistics Worldwide Government Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Iap World Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021