Westfield Borough v. Tioga Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 298, Jan. T., 1892, by defendant, from decree of C. P. Tioga Co., Jan. T., 1892, No. 16, for plaintiffs, in petition for an alternative mandamus, against defendants to compel completion of approaches to county bridge. The facts appear from the following opinion of the court below, by Mitchell, P. J. : “ This case is submitted on petition, answer and replication. No question of fact is in dispute.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 298, Jan. T., 1892, by defendant, from decree of C. P. Tioga Co., Jan. T., 1892, No. 16, for plaintiffs, in petition for an alternative mandamus, against defendants to compel completion of approaches to county bridge. The facts appear from the following opinion of the court below, by Mitchell, P. J. : “ This case is submitted on petition, answer and replication. No question of fact is in dispute. The question presented by the pleadings is whether it is the duty of the defendants to build the approaches to a count}!- bridge, the location of which is lawfully fixed in the borough of…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam,
This case has been so thoroughly discussed by the learned judge below, that nothing further remains to be said. We affirm the judgment for the reasons given by him in his opinion.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by16 opinions
- Gymnastic Ass'n of the South Side of Milwaukee v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Town of Old Saybrook v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Town of Norwalk v. PodmoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Heinlein v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Schlosser v. Manor TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.