Legal Opinion

Town of Norwalk v. Podmore

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 17, 1913PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the Superior Court in Fairfield County, Holcomb, J., accepting the report of a committee and awarding one of the defendants $4,285 as damages for taking her land for bridge and park purposes.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment entered upon the acceptance of the report of a committee assessing damages to the defendant Kate H. Podmore, for land and building taken by the plaintiff town of Norwalk for bridge and park purposes pursuant to a Special Act (16 Special Laws, p. 490). No formal judgment was entered upon the appointment of the committee to assess the damages to the claimants or owners of the land and buildings taken for the new concrete bridge, steel draw, and approaches to be constructed in place of the existing Washington Street bridge in Norwalk. Nor are the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brakken v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  2. People ex rel. Putnam v. Commissioners of Buffalo CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Village of Sandpoint v. DoyleIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Blais v. FranklinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1910
  5. Farist Steel Co. v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Antman v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  2. Coffin v. LaskauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  3. State Highway Board v. BaxterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  4. Laurel, Inc. v. Commissioner of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. Johnson v. Town of WatertownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API