Legal Opinion

Wachtel v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1935PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

The plaintiff is the beneficiary named in policies issued by the three defendant insurance companies, insuring the fife of her husband. The policies contain clauses, differing only in immaterial detail, providing for double indemnity to be paid upon due proof that the death of the insured resulted from bodily injuries caused directly, exclusively and independently of all other causes by external, violent and purely accidental means. The assured died on August 10, 1930. The companies did not dispute liability for the stipulated indemnity to be paid upon proof of the death of the insured. They…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pythias Knights' Supreme Lodge v. BeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. O'Reilly v. . Guardian Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Rudolph v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Hanna v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Spencer v. Citizens' Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Ando v.WoodberryNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Binder v. Commercial Travelers Mut. Acc. Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  3. Howe v. National Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  4. High Fashions Hair Cutters v. Commercial Union InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. John Alt Furniture Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API