Legal Opinion
Harasymczuk v. Massachusetts Accident Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 27, 1926PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.
This is an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendant on an accident insurance policy, the plaintiff’s contention being that he is entitled to recover the sum of $50 per month between September 24, 1924, and the 1st day of May, 1925, or a sum which plaintiff claims is $361.65. Upon the trial the plaintiff waived any claimed indemnity under the policy as to hospital treatment.
The insurance policy under which the plaintiff endeavors to recover in this action was issued to him by the defendant on the 18th day of August, 1924, and the policy under paragraph C thereof provides as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Rocci v. Massachusetts Accident Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Menneiley v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Continental Casualty Co. v. MatthisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. BranhamIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- McGrail v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Wright v. Prudential Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Davidson v. First American InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
- Penrose v. Commercial Travelers Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1954
- LaBarge v. United InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1956
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.