Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Matthis

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 8, 1912PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Branch, Second Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Winn —

Affirming.

On January 24, 1911, appellant issued to appellee an accident policy covering an indemnity of $40 per month for total disability resulting from accident. On January 27, the insured scratched his thumb on a carpet tack, from which blood poison developed. Pie sued the' company for the indemnity, and from a judgment in his favor the company appeals.

The company claims that the petition is not good. It was not until the amended petition was filed upon the trial. With that amendment in, the plaintiff’s pleadings substantially charged the issual of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Omberg v. United States Mutual Accident Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
  2. Hohn v. Inter-State Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Cary v. Preferred Accident InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Central Accident Insurance v. RembeIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Kenton Ins. v. WiggintonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. North American Accident Ins. Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Rathbun v. Globe Indemnity Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Horn's Administrator v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States v. FanninCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  5. Wright v. Prudential Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API