Haug v. Riley
Supreme Court of Georgia
Complaint on note. Before Judge Hart. Baldwin superior court. January term, 1896.
1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.
Suit was brought in the court below against Robert Whitfield and F. Haug upon a promissory note signed by them as joint makers. The court directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and Haug brings the case here for review. As his codefendant filed no defense to the action, and is not a party to the present writ of error, we shall, for convenience, deal with the case as though the plaintiff in error was the only party defendant in the lower court.
1. Complaint is made that the court, over the defendant’s objection, allowed the plaintiff “to establish a copy of the note sued, in lieu of the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Goodman v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
- Wallace v. Tumlin & StegallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
- Fox v. Bank of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- M. J. Atkins & Co. v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
- Benson v. Abbott, Parker & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Sullivan v. CurlingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Patton v. Bank of LaFayetteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Brazil v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Hendrix v. Bauhard Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Adams v. Madison Realty & Development, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.