Legal Opinion

Jernigan v. Holden

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1894PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange ■county. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of "the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Liddon, C. J.:

This case was an action of ejectment brought by appellant against appellees. The declaration was in the usual statutory form, and the plea was not guilty. By consent of parties the case was referred to E. M. Hammond, Esq., who, as referee, rendered judgdmentfor the defendants (appellees), from which the plaintiff (appellant) appeals.

The record is quite voluminous, and many interesting points are discussed in the briefs of counsel. The view we take of the case relieves us from the consider*532ation. of all but one of them. This, the only question requiring consideration at our hands,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dexter & Limerick Plank Road Co. v. AllenNew York Supreme Court · 1852
  2. Pierpont v. CrouchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  3. State v. ConklingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Holland v. State ex rel. Duval CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1887
  5. State ex rel. Flack v. RogersNevada Supreme Court · 1875

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. American Bakeries Co. v. City of Haines CitySupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  2. State Ex Rel. Davis v. RoseSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  3. Realty Bond & Share Co. v. EnglarSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. Sparkman v. State ex rel. Bank of Ybor CitySupreme Court of Florida · 1916
  5. Munch v. TusaNebraska Supreme Court · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API