Pierpont v. Crouch
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, County of Mapa. The facts of the case sufficiently appear in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtField, J.
Terry, C. J., and Baldwin, J., concurring.
The relator is the district-attorney, and the defendant is the auditor, of Mapa county; and the question between them relates to the salary to which the relator is entitled for the quarter commencing on the first Monday of October, 1857.' By the act of May, 1855, fixing the compensation of the district-attorneys of the several counties of the State, the yearly salary of the district-attorney of Mapa county is fixed at one thousand dollars, but by the act of February, 1857, entitled “An Act to fix the Compensation of the County Judge and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rogers v. WatrousTexas Supreme Court · 1852
- Washington v. PageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854
3Cited by36 opinions
- Bowman v. CockrillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
- Clark v. City of Los AngeLesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. GutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
- Mack v. JastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Inre Yick WoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.