Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Davis v. Rose

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 9, 1929PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

Upon information lodged in this Court by the Attorney General in behalf of the State and K. R. Murrell, a citizen, a writ of quo warranto was issued directed to Rose, Hammond and Rannie to answer by what warrant or authority they claim to have or exercise the office and powers of Florida Real Estate Commissioners.

The respondents demurred to the information.

The writ charges that it appears from the petition (information) that the respondents usurped and assumed to exercise the office under “Chapter 11336, Laws of Florida, Extraordinary Session 1925, and also House Bill Number 469, Laws of…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Thurlow v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
  3. Butchers' Union Slaughter-House & Live-Stock Landing Co. v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Quinn v. PhippsSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  5. Thorpe v. Rutland & Burlington RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Gaulden v. KirkSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  2. State v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. State Ex Rel. Fulton v. IvesSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  4. Florida Motor Lines, Inc. v. Railroad CommissionersSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  5. Florida Bar v. BrumbaughSupreme Court of Florida · 1978

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API