Legal Opinion

Van Horn v. Van De Wol, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 15, 1972No. 1086-1PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Defendant Van De Wol, Inc. operates a golf course. Plaintiff Van Horn, while a stockholder in defendant corporation, made several loans to defendant, totaling $37,000, and received unsecured demand notes in return. Subsequently, before selling his stock to an investor produced by the corporation, plaintiff entered into an agreement providing, among other things, that he would not accelerate payment of the notes so long as the terms of the agreement were complied with, but that if he should at any time deem himself insecure he would have the right to demand payment of the notes.

Approximately 1…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Murray v. LardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  3. Graham v. White-Phillips Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Huzzy v. Culbert Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  5. Skookum Lumber Co. v. Sacajawea Lumber & Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. K.M.C. Co., Inc. v. Irving Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  2. Don Brown, Josef H. Miller and Allen L. McAlear v. Avemco Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. FARMERS CO-OP. EL., INC., DUNCOMBE v. State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  4. Rigby Corp. v. Boatmen's Bank and Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. State Bank of Lehi v. WoolseyUtah Supreme Court · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API