State v. Lasley
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
LAVORATO, Chief Justice.
This proceeding stems from a charge of an alleged sale of cigarettes to an under-aged person by an individual on an Indian reservation in violation of Iowa Code section 453A.2(1) (Supp.2001). A magistrate dismissed the charge, concluding that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because of Indian sovereign immunity. The State sought discretionary review, which we granted. The Sac and Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa (Tribe), owner of the establishment where the offense allegedly took place, sought the dismissal. The State contends the magistrate had subject…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- California v. Cabazon Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bryan v. Itasca CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Negonsott v. SamuelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. LaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Simon Seeding & Sod, Inc. v. Dubuque Human Rights Commission and Jermaine StapletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Schott v. SchottSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
- White v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2011
- In the interest of E.D.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2012
- In the Interest of J.M.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.