Legal Opinion

United States v. Lara

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 19, 2004No. 03-107PublishedCited by 211 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breyer

| ^This case concerns a congressional statute “recogniz[ing] and affirm[ing]” the “inherent” authority of a tribe to bring a criminal misdemeanor prosecution against an Indian who is not a member of that tribe—authority that this Court previously held a tribe did not possess. Compare 25 U.S.C. § 1301(2) with Duro v. Reina, 495 U.S. 676, 110 S.Ct. 2053, 109 L.Ed.2d 693 (1990). We must decide whether Congress has the constitutional power to relax restrictions that the political branches have, over time, placed on the exercise of a tribe’s inherent legal authority. We conclude that Congress does…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  5. United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by211 opinions

  1. Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian CommunitySupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Michael Wang v. Robert Masaitis, U.S. MarshalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. KG Urban Enterprises, LLC v. PatrickCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  4. Plains Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land & Cattle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Oklahoma v. Castro-HuertaSupreme Court of the United States · 2022

206 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API