Legal Opinion
Cruz v. New York City Housing Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 17, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anita Florio, J.), entered October 25, 1990, which granted plaintiff leave to serve a late notice of claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
On April 7, 1990, plaintiff was allegedly injured when she fell due to an accumulation of excess wax and milk on the hallway floor of her apartment building. Defendant disputed plaintiff’s allegation that two days after the accident, she completed an accident report at the New York City Housing Authority Management offices at the Baychester Housing Projects. One day prior to the expiration of the 90-day statutory…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mazzilli v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Simmons v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by4 opinions
- Soto v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Jenkins v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Lozada v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Cabezas v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992