Legal Opinion

Lozada v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 28, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lewis R. Friedman, J.), entered on or about December 20, 1991 which denied defendant Housing Authority’s motion for an order dismissing the complaint as time-barred and which granted plaintiffs’ cross-motion, pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5), for leave to serve a late notice of claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In the circumstances, we find it to have been a reasonable exercise of discretion for the court to grant the application eight and one-half months beyond the ninety day period (see, Cruz v New York City Hous. Auth., 178 AD2d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gerzel v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Stenowich v. Colonie Industrial Development AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Cruz v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ruffino v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Mounsey v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Matter of Kerner v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. Resto v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API