Legal Opinion
Soto v. New York City Housing Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 25, 1992PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Irma Vidal Santaella, J.), entered on or about January 30, 1991, which granted claimants’ application to serve a late notice of claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
On January 19, 1990, Eduardo Soto allegedly fell on an accumulation of debris on a common stairway located in one of respondent’s projects, and was transported from the accident scene by ambulance to St. Claire’s Hospital. A Housing Authority police officer filed a report on that day stating that he observed what appeared to be a puddle of urine at the scene, that he notified persons to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Goodall v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- McLoughlin v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Cruz v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Olmo v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lopez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Rao v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Rodriguez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Duarte v. Suffolk CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Matter of Dubuche v. New York City Tr. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.