Legal Opinion

Cabezas v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 4, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley L. Sklar, J.), entered July 3, 1991, which granted petitioners’ motion for leave to file a late notice of claim against the municipal defendant, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In the circumstances we find it to have been a reasonable exercise of discretion for the court to grant the application to file two months beyond the 90-day period (see, Cruz v New York City Hous. Auth., 178 AD2d 291). Petitioner Juan Cabe*241zas was severely incapacitated, by the severance of his right arm. Further, we note that the defendant Housing Authority had agents…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cruz v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ippolito v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Gadson v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API