Legal Opinion

Di Nome v. Personal Finance Co. of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1943PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoughran, J.

This defendant is a “ licensed lender ” under article 9 of the Banking Law — the “ Small Loans Act.” Section 353 thereof provides: “ Every licensee shall: Deliver to the borrower at the time any loan is made a statement * * * in the English language showing in clear and distinct terms the amount and date of the loan and of its maturity, the nature of the security, if any, for the loan, the name and address of the borrower and of the licensee, and the agreed rate of charge * * *.” o

Plaintiff borrowed from the defendant $190 on a promissory note secured by a chattel mortgage. The debt was to be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Bank v. . LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. People v. Wallace CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Atta v. BerginSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Freitas v. Geddes Savings & Loan Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Brame v. Ray Bills Finance Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1979
  3. Smith Beverage Co. of Columbia, Inc. v. ReissSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  4. Public Loan Co. v. HydeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  5. Conrad v. Home & Auto Loan Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API