Conrad v. Home & Auto Loan Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtDillon, J.
Defendant is a licensed lender under article 9 of the Banking Law. On June 12, 1972 plaintiffs procured a loan from defendant which was payable in monthly installments over a three-year period. Essentially, plaintiffs made timely payments, but this action was commenced on December 17, 1974 before the loan was fully repaid. For reasons not explained in the record, plaintiffs continued making payments during the pendency of this action, and the loan was fully satisfied and discharged.
Plaintiffs seek relief under section 358 of the Banking Law which provides, inter alia, that any loan made in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Darweger v. StaatsNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Di Nome v. Personal Finance Co. of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- People v. MailmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- People v. MailmanNew York Court of Special Session · 1944
- Rosenblum v. Family Finance Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lincoln First Bank v. RupertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Brame v. Ray Bills Finance Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1979
- Town of Islip v. CuomoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Public Loan Co. v. HydeNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- Conrad v. Beneficial Finance Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.