Legal Opinion

Smith Beverage Co. of Columbia, Inc. v. Reiss

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 15, 1978No. 60002PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RENDLEN, Judge.

Declaratory judgment action for construction of the State Use Tax laws. Respondents seek a declaration that the Revenue Department’s amended Rule 34 conflicts with the Use Tax exemption provisions of § 144.615(6), RSMo 1969,1 and is thus invalid, also for an injunction to stay enforcement of the Rule and a determination that respondents and others of their class qualify for the exemption afforded by the statute.

In the first hearing of the cause, the trial court adjudged the questioned portion of amended Rule 34 invalid as conflicting with § 144.615(6), and enjoined its…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gay v. Canada Dry Bottling Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  2. State Ex Rel. Thompson-Stearns-Roger v. SchaffnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  3. Wichita Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
  4. Arkansas Beverage Company v. HeathSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  5. City of St. Louis v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. William E. Hughes v. Alan S. WhitmerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  2. Sipco, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  3. Floyd Charcoal Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  4. O'Flaherty v. State Tax Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  5. Coca Cola Bottling of Northampton v. Commr. of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API