Legal Opinion

Killela v. Hall

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 3, 2000No. Civ.A. 99-30123-MAPPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WITH REGARD TO RESPONDENTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PETITIONER’S HABEAS CORPUS PETITION (Docket Nos. 12 & 20)

PONSOR, District Judge.

Upon de novo review, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Kenneth P. Neiman dated December 3, 1999 is hereby ADOPTED. As Magistrate Judge Neiman’s memorandum carefully demonstrates, the state court’s decision here properly rests on petitioner’s procedural default, independent of any Constitutional question. Petitioner has demonstrated neither “cause and prejudice” nor any significant evidence of a…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dunker v. BissonnetteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
  2. Mayne v. HallDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
  3. Omosefunmi v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF COM. OF MASS.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API