Legal Opinion

Mayne v. Hall

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided November 15, 2000No. CIV. A. 00-11209-RGSPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

STEARNS, District Judge.

I ADOPT the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate/Judge.

SO ORDERED.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET ENTRY #8)

BOWLER, United States Magistrate Judge.

Respondent Timothy Hall (“respondent”) 1 moves to dismiss the above styled petition for writ of habeas corpus as untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) (“section 2244(d)”) of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“the AEDPA”). 2 Petitioner attacks his 1992 conviction in Massachusetts Superior Court Department (Suffolk County) (“the trial…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. Emiliano Valencia-CopeteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. Pablo Escoboza VegaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  4. Jesus Nino v. George Galaza, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Dale Swartz v. Meyers, Superintendent Pennsylvania Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McGuinness v. PepeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
  2. Caron v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
  3. Kilburn v. MaloneyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API