Legal Opinion

State v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 16, 1980No. 8012SC250PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Robert M.) Judge.

Defendant’s assignments of error concern the trial court’s instructions to the jury. We find all assignments of error to be without merit.

First, defendant assigns as error the trial court’s instruction to the jury concerning the scrutiny to be accorded eyewitness testimony. Defendant has not assigned as error the use of the in-court show-up procedure at the preliminary hearing. However he contends that due to the importance of the eyewitness testimony, he was irreparably prejudiced by the court’s cursory instructions on factors to be assessed in evaluating the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. GuffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. State v. CarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. HewettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. ChaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  2. State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. NarronCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. State v. BunchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  5. State v. BunchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API