Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 3, 2006No. 346A05PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADY, Justice.

The sole question presented is whether there is a reasonable likelihood that the trial court’s instruction to the jury on second-degree rape impermissibly lessened the State’s burden to prove the elements of force and lack of consent beyond a reasonable doubt. Because the trial court failed to instruct the jurors that they must find the dispositive fact in this case beyond a reasonable doubt, we hold that the jury instructions were flawed and affirm the Court of Appeals order granting defendant a new trial.

After being indicted by a grand jury on 21 October 2002, defendant…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  2. State v. HollomanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
  3. State v. NarronCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. State v. MummaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  5. State v. AustinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API