Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 24, 1986No. 1 CA-CIV 8591PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONTRERAS, Judge.

The issue in this appeal is whether an exclusionary clause in an automobile insurance policy excluding liability coverage for bodily injury to “any ... family member of an insured residing in the same household as the insured” applied to a newlywed spouse who had not yet begun to live with the insured. 1 We conclude that the exclusionary clause does not apply and affirm the judgment.

The facts in this case are undisputed. On February 5, 1983, Sally Hastings Johnson flew with Glen Johnson to Las Vegas, Nevada, where they were married that afternoon. They spent the night…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Arthur v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Tomlyanovich v. TomlyanovichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co. v. PulsiferDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1941
  4. Pamperin v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Shirley C. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Farmers Mutual Insurance v. TuckerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Amco Insurance v. NortonNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Mendota Insurance v. GallegosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  4. Gordinier v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  5. Farmers Mutual Insurance v. TuckerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API