Legal Opinion

Cummins and Walker Oil Co. v. Smith

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided August 28, 1991No. 04-90-00244-CVPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REEVES, Chief Justice.

This appeal arises out of a suit for specific performance of certain letter agreements, declaratory relief, and an accounting. Plaintiffs, appellees, claimed that Cummins & Walker Oil Co., Inc., appellants, breached certain letter agreements between the parties in which Cummins & Walker promised to assign to each of the plaintiffs an after payout working interest. Cummins & Walker interposed limitations, and counterclaimed for a declaratory judgment and attorney’s fees.

Cummins & Walker’s only defense was an alleged limitations bar. The case was submitted to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gabriel v. AlhabbalCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Commonwealth, Revenue Cabinet v. GossumKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
  3. American Housing Resources, Inc. v. SlaughterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Condor Petroleum Co. v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Clements v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1852

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. John Priester, Jr. v. JP Morgan Chase BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  2. Alma Group, L.L.C. v. Palmer, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
  3. Markel Insurance Co. v. MuzykaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
  4. Crow-Southland Joint Venture No. 1 v. North Fort Worth Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  5. Panther Creek Ventures, Ltd. v. Collin Central Appraisal District, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API