Legal Opinion

Crow-Southland Joint Venture No. 1 v. North Fort Worth Bank

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 24, 1992No. 05-91-01313-CVPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KAPLAN, Justice.

This case involves conflicting claims to proceeds from the sale of certain collateral. North Fort Worth Bank (Bank) claimed a superior right to the proceeds based on a promissory note, security agreement, and financing statement. Crow-Southland Joint Venture No. 1 (Crow-Southland) asserted a right to the proceeds pursuant to a contractual and statutory landlord’s lien. The trial court awarded the proceeds to Bank. Crow-Southland appeals. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

1. Bank’s Claim

On May 11, 1981, Diversified Packaging, Inc. executed a promissory note in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Texas Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Burns v. American Nat. Ins.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  3. Villa v. Alvarado State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Lambda Construction Co. v. Chamberlin Waterproofing & Roofing Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. M.J.R.'s Fare of Dallas, Inc. v. Permit & License Appeal Board of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. First Valley Bank of Los Fresnos v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. City of Galveston v. Giles, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  3. Monasco v. Gilmer Boating and Fishing Club, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011
  4. Orix Credit Alliance, Inc. v. Omnibank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Jim Sowell Construction Co. v. Dallas Central Appraisal District, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1995

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API